College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students

Letter to the Editor: Fundamentalist Christians negatively influence campus

Published: Wednesday, October 6, 2010

Updated: Wednesday, October 6, 2010 22:10

  • Tweet

With the new academic year, the fundamentalist Christians return to campus as faithfully as swallows to Capistrano. They peddle an intolerant brand of religion fully comparable to those most Americans find abhorrent in distant lands. They are content to ignore the intellectual achievements of our civilization over the past 500, 1000, 5000 years. They are proud of their ignorance of geology, cosmology, physics, chemistry, biology, our Constitution and the history of humanity recorded in rock and word. I suspect even I know more about the Bible than their collective knowledge of all this other stuff. It would be amusing except …

Fundamentalists have acquired influence on our political institutions far beyond what is just and healthy for a reasonably tolerant democratic country. (We certainly have had our bouts of intolerance, some quite horrid, and continue to exhibit this predilection. But by world standards, we seem to be doing  pretty well. The fact that I can write this letter testifies to our above-average tolerance. Without this tradition, my immediate ancestors would never have made it out of Eastern Europe.) Witness, for example, the excessive influence that fundamentalists have had on the decision about whether embryos destined for destruction can be used as sources of stem cells. Stem cell technology offers great promise for alleviating some forms of human suffering.    

Excessive influence by the intolerant reflects both apathy and naiveté on the part of the rest of us. We risk the establishment of a theocracy based on a narrow-minded interpretation of one set of texts sacred to some people, in fact just a minority of humans on earth. De facto theocracy would have disastrous consequences on education, health care, social welfare, conservation, etc. The list goes on and on. De facto theocracy already exists in some places in our country and already has had such consequences. Fundamentalists  in Texas have had excessive influence on high school science texts and forced the inclusion of science fiction where it does not belong.   

Fundamentalism has contorted a religion based on love into something far darker. A university is supposed to be Pirsig's "church of reason," not the "domain of demagoguery." They certainly have the right to be out there peddling their tracts - our Constitution guarantees that. But we all need to be alert to the appeal to irrationality and intolerance fundamental to their pursuit. Especially because intolerance, irrationality and anti-intellectualism seem to be sweeping the country. After all, we as a species have achieved some greater sophistication since our ancestors were pastoralists wandering in the desert 8000 years ago.

Peter Goldman

Professor Emeritus of Biology

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

1 comments Log in to Comment

TSUAlumnus
Thu Oct 7 2010 09:59
Summary of this letter:

I am tolerant. Also, this is why I hate these people and why I am SO MUCH BETTER
than them and will never consider them to have any value. But I am tolerant.

If I've seen this pack of ironically-intolerant brand of extremist-liberal cliches once, I've seen it a thousand times. Ignoring the fact that many, if not most, universities were started specifically to bring glory to their God by discovering and passing down the wonders of nature and human culture, Goldman resorts to nothing more than a version of the juvenile "My ideology can beat up your ideology" in place of intellectual argument. Writing a letter that sprays a shotgun shell of topics in which he claims that morality has no place, Goldman does not make any progress towards anyone of his intellectual superiority.

At the risk of stooping to a tit-for-tat, I must, once again, correct the standard liberal line about the legality of the destruction of embryos for stem cell research. It has NEVER been illegal. Bush merely disallowed the use of tax money to fund it. Private money can, and is, being used to fund embryonic stem cell research. For those who are less inclined to destroy living creatures, however, adult stem cell research has shown much more actual results towards helping treat illness, both before the tax-money ban and now. And besides the positive results, doesn't it simply make more sense that stem cells taken from you yourself would be more compatible than stem cells taken from someone with a different genetic structure than you? That sounds like basic science to me.

You must be logged in to comment on an article. Not already a member? Register now

Log In